![]() If you have an impairment(s) that meets or equals one of our listings in appendix 1 of this subpart and meets the duration requirement, we will find that you are disabled. (iii) At the third step, we also consider the medical severity of your impairment(s). If you do not have a severe medically determinable physical or mental impairment that meets the duration requirement in § 404.1509, or a combination of impairments that is severe and meets the duration requirement, we will find that you are not disabled. (ii) At the second step, we consider the medical severity of your impairment(s). If you are doing substantial gainful activity, we will find that you are not disabled. (i) At the first step, we consider your work activity, if any. ( See paragraph (e) of this section.) We use this residual functional capacity assessment at both step four and step five when we evaluate your claim at these steps. Before we go from step three to step four, we assess your residual functional capacity. If we cannot find that you are disabled or not disabled at a step, we go on to the next step. If we can find that you are disabled or not disabled at a step, we make our determination or decision and we do not go on to the next step. See paragraph (h) of this section for an exception to this rule. The sequential evaluation process is a series of five “steps” that we follow in a set order. (4) The five-step sequential evaluation process. The SEP is spelled out in the regulations at 20 CFR § 404.1520 for SSD and 20 CFR § 416.920 for SSI, but the text of the regulation is identical in both sections. This is also required at the lower levels of initial application and reconsideration, but the analysis is not all shared right away in a written decision – while there exists a written decision going through the steps, it’s not sent right away, but instead just resides in the claim file. ![]() When a claim goes to a hearing, the ALJ is required to spell out his or her findings to each of these steps in the course of the written decision. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.The SEP is the legal test that an adjudicator has to perform in determining whether a person is disabled. The exact solution for sequentially testing two simple hypotheses concerning the parameter p, 0 < p < 1, of a negative binomial process is explicitly given. The well-known solutions of the Wiener and the Poisson sequential testing can be derived from our procedure. As usual in this framework, the initial optimal stopping problem is reduced to a free-boundary problem, solved through the principles of the smooth and/or continuous fit. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.ĪB - We present the sequential testing of two simple hypotheses for a large class of Lévy processes. N2 - We present the sequential testing of two simple hypotheses for a large class of Lévy processes. T1 - Sequential Testing Problems for Lévy Processes
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |